Budget outlay on medical insurance up, public health infrastructure down


       Whether it is better to buy fish for years or provide people with fishing net? This applies to public health care system in India.  Times of India analysis points out the need to build and strengthen   the public health care system. Building of infrastructure for massive population requires funds, but ultimately the investment will bring down the cost of treatment and better delivery of health care to the country.

                     NEW DELHI: The health budget is good news for the private health sector as there has been a substantial increase in allocation for health insurance schemes such as the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS), treatment for CGHS pensioners and the Ayushman Bharat scheme. Government’s own data has shown that the private health sector corners the bulk of the spending under these schemes, which saw a nearly 22% jump in allocation in the 2023-24 budget.

          In contrast, the allocation for schemes aimed at improvement in public health infrastructure has declined when adjusted for inflation. These include the National Health Mission (NHM), Pradhan Mantri Ayushman Bharat Health Infrastructure Mission (PMABHIM), human resources for health and medical education and Pradhan Mantri Swasthya Suraksha Yojana (PMSSY).

The overall allocation for health after rising during Covid, has come down in real terms though it seems like an increase in nominal terms from Rs 83,000 in the budget estimates (BE) for the current year to Rs 86, 175 crore in BE 2023-24. The revised estimates (RE) for the current year indicate a 9% decline from the BE to Rs 76,370 crore. The allocation for insurance schemes, however increased substantially in RE 2022-23; more than 75% hike in allocation for CGHS pensioners from Rs 2,645 crore to Rs 4,640 crore and for the first time since the launch of Ayushman Bharat scheme, the RE is the same as the BE at Rs 6,400 crore. In the past, only about half the budgeted amount for Ayushman was getting spent. However, the allocation for all the public infrastructure schemes put together has been slashed by 16% in the RE for the current year. In comparison to the Rs 13,266 crore allocated for insurance schemes, which cover only a section of the population, about Rs 30,000 crore has been allocated for the National Health Mission and a separate Rs 6,500 crore for human resources for health and medical education, which was earlier part of the NHM budget.

         Most of the allocation for the insurance schemes usually ends up in the coffers of the private sector. Despite private hospitals accounting for only 46% of empanelled hospitals under Ayushman Bharat, for instance, they accounted for 54% of hospitals admissions and since private healthcare is more expensive, that could account for a much higher proportion of the money spent. Most CGHS beneficiaries too go to private hospitals as noted by Dr Rakesh Sarwal, who was advisor health in Niti Aayog, in a study of the scheme. Dr Sarwal stated that CGHS had a higher cost of service because of its greater reliance on private facilities. Incidentally, though the finance minister announced a mission to eliminate sickle cell anaemia, there is no separate budget line for it. Thus even the money for a totally new scheme might have to come from within the NHM budget, further eating into the allocation. The tertiary care programme, which provides for transfer to states for implementing national programmes on control of blindness, tobacco control, capacity building for trauma centres and for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases such as cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and stroke, has had its allocation slashed to just Rs 290 crore, less than the actual spending of Rs 300 crore in 2020-21, and 42% less than the allocation of Rs 500 in the last budget.

The budget for the establishment and strengthening of the branches of the National Centre for Disease Control and for preparation and control of zoonotic and other neglected tropical diseases and for diseases surveillance, which had gone up during Covid, has been slashed from Rs 71.6 crore to just Rs 55.6 crore, despite the WHO asking countries to prepare for future pandemics by strengthening surveillance. Even the budget for the Indian Council for Medical Research, which played a crucial role during Covid, has been slashed along with a cut in the overall allocation for health research.

Advantages-Disadvantage of being a doctor

     25 factors- why health care is expensive

REEL Heroes Vs Real Heroes

 21 occupational risks to doctors and nurses

Covid paradox: salary cut for doctors other paid at home

   Medical-Consumer protection Act- Pros and Cons

Expensive Medical College  seat- Is it worth it?

NEET- Not so Neat- percentile system

The  Myth  of  cost of  spending  on  medical  education needs to be made  transparent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: