Transition from   ‘Natural death’ to Medicalized Death- Paradox  of dying process

Death is the inevitable conclusion of life, a universal destiny that all living creatures share.   It’s an age-old idea that a good life and a good death go together. Death and dying have become unbalanced in high-income countries, and increasingly in low-and-middle-income countries; there is an excessive focus on clinical interventions at the end of life, to the detriment of broader inputs and contributions.

      The story of dying in the 21st century is a story of paradox. While many people are over-treated in hospitals, with families and communities relegated to the margins, still more remain undertreated, dying of preventable conditions and without access to basic pain relief. In this present era, process of dying represents unbalanced and contradictory picture of death.  

Even though medical advances continue to increase life expectancy, they have raised an entirely new set of issues associated with death and dying. For example, how long should advanced medical technology be used to keep comatose people alive? How should the elderly or incapacitated be cared for? Is it reasonable for people to stop medical treatment, or even actively end their life, if that is what they wish?

          Before the 12th century he describes a period of “Tamed death,”  where death was familiar, and people knew how to die. The dying and their families accepted death calmly; they knew when death was coming and what to do; dying was a public event attended by children.

    Death can occur through conflict, accident, natural disaster, pandemic, violence, suicide, neglect, or disease. The great success with antibiotics vaccines has perhaps further fuelled the fantasy that science can defeat death. But this temporary success as only has been the result of discovery of germ theory and antibiotics.

     In true sense, Death still remains invincible.

   The fear of death also involves the fear of separation.

     As families and communities want more and more hospital care, when critically sick, health systems have occupied the centre stage in the process of dying.  Dying people are whisked away to hospitals or hospices, and whereas two generations ago most children would have seen a dead body, people may now be in their 40s or 50s without ever seeing a dead person. The language, knowledge, and confidence to support and manage dying are being lost, further fuelling a dependence on health-care services.


   Death systems are the means by which death and dying are understood, regulated, and managed. These systems implicitly or explicitly determine where people die, how people dying and their families should behave, how bodies are disposed of, how people mourn, and what death means for that culture or community.

Death systems are unique to societies and cultures.

    The increased number of deaths in hospital means that ever fewer people have witnessed or managed a death at home. This lack of experience and confidence causes a positive feedback loop that reinforces a dependence on institutional care of the dying.

     Medical culture, fear of litigation, and financial complexities contribute to overtreatment at the end of life, further fuelling institutional deaths and the sense that professionals must manage death. Social customs influence the conversations in clinics and in intensive care units, often maintaining the tradition of not discussing death openly. More undiscussed deaths in institutions behind closed doors further reduce social familiarity with and understanding of death and dying.

     How people die has changed radically over recent generations. Death comes later in life for many and dying is often prolonged. Futile or potentially inappropriate treatment can continue into the last hours of life. The roles of families and communities have receded as death and dying have become unfamiliar and skills, traditions, and knowledge are lost.

    At first only the rich could expect that doctors would delay death. However, by the 20th century this expectation had come to be seen as a civic right.

         ‘Natural death’ is now the point at which the human organism refuses any further input of treatment.

       Corporatization of health care has projected medicine as a purchasable commodity and consequently resulted in an illogical distribution of health care. People, who can afford, spend millions in the last few days of their life, just to have only a few more days to live. Resources spent in such a futile quest are equivalent to thousands of times the money for food and medicines for the poor who lose lives for fraction of that expense.

     Death is not so much denied but has become invisible to people. People now have less understanding and less acceptance of death. The death is more perceived as failure of medical treatment rather than an invincible power or a certain final event.

     Advantages-Disadvantage of being a doctor

     25 factors- why health care is expensive

REEL Heroes Vs Real Heroes

 21 occupational risks to doctors and nurses

Covid paradox: salary cut for doctors other paid at home

   Medical-Consumer protection Act- Pros and Cons

Expensive Medical College  seat- Is it worth it?

4 thoughts on “Transition from   ‘Natural death’ to Medicalized Death- Paradox  of dying process

Add yours

  1. This article is a great expression of the big reality DEATH, a topic as Dr. Pankaj mentioned we tend to avoid talking about in contrast with the huge celebration of birth. It’s also a known fact that what starts has to end. This harsh acceptance of THE END is very tough as we can’t let go . My father is right now at this juncture where I feel selfish in prolonging his breaths even though he may not be as much aware of it . May be he has or minor chance he has not given up on his will to stay on when medical science has reached a still point in his care or recovery.
    But this article is a reminder how this stage was so differently dealt n accepted in ancient times. That’s what I told my daughters too as they were reluctant to face a situation like this . This is a cycle of life and we need to respect the nature . Wishing strength to all .

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Death proves that there is God or spiritual world beyond this material world. From the beginning of time, no body could conquer death. That simply means there is spiritual power that controls birth, existence and finally death. We all know that energy can’t be created or destroyed. Prof. Einstein proved that everything is energy and that’s all there is to it. This simple means we are nothing but energy. Material and spiritual energies are different. Both the energies have no beginning or end, but one can be recycled from one form to another, whereas spiritual energy (God) is unchangeable. We come to this world again and again until we become pure like spirit and graduate to a point of no return; Or we come back to this place of testing, agony and ecstasy again and again. So, in reality there is nothing like death. This material world is an illusion; our true self is pure spirit. Once we realise this truth, we become free.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Aptly put.
    Howsoever unacceptable death may be , yet the only certainty in life is death.
    And this one thing should come out of texts into peoples’ consciousness.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: