Doctors need genuine Leave – painful barb for others @ Tokyo medical school


Japan medical school admits to altering scores to keep out female applicants

  Usually the kind of work of doctors keep them on toes and it is difficult to have leaves. This may be a global  phenomenon.  Medical systems also are not very comfortable with doctor’s leaves. Scarcity of doctors and difficult replacements makes life of doctors busy and unsocial.  Systematic  denial of genuine leave has been proved by  investigations  at   Tokyo medical school.

 

A Tokyo medical school has confirmed after an internal investigation that it systematically altered entrance exam scores for years to keep out female applicants and ensure more men became doctors. The school wanted fewer female doctors because it anticipated they would become mothers and would shorten or halt their careers. It is extremely important to improve the working environment so that women can pursue their medical professions. School’s purpose in denying women entry was because female doctors often quit working after starting families. Women tend to avoid tough jobs like surgery or work in remote areas. They need to take a break from their careers because of pregnancy and childbirth.

 Tokyo Medical University manipulated all entrance tests results since 2000 or even earlier. The findings released Tuesday by lawyers involved in the internal investigation confirm recent reports in Japanese media.

The manipulation surfaced during an investigation of an alleged wrongful admission of a bureaucrat’s son.

The internal investigation found the school first reduced all applicants’ first-stage scores to 80 percent then added up to 20 points only to male applicants with three or fewer application tries.

The school wanted fewer female doctors because it anticipated they would become mothers and would shorten or halt their careers.

Japan’s government urged a medical university to promptly disclose the results of an investigation into its admissions process Friday after reports alleged it had altered the test scores of female applicants for years to deny them entry and ensure fewer women became doctors.

The school’s public affairs department said it had no knowledge of the reported manipulation but is investigating. The school is already facing a separate scandal involving the inappropriate admission of a top education bureaucrat’s son and was ordered by the education ministry to investigate its admissions records for the past six years. On Thursday, the school said it will combine the examination of the score manipulation allegation with that probe.

The share of female doctors who have passed the national medical exam has stayed at around 30 percent for more than 20 years, prompting speculation that interference in admissions is widespread at Japanese medical schools.

The Japanese medical university’s alleged systematic deduction of entrance exam scores only from female applicants has sparked outrage across Japan. It was reported Thursday that Tokyo Medical University has been slashing female applicants’ entrance exam scores for years to keep female student population low, on grounds they tend to quit as doctors after starting families, causing staffing shortages

Admissions records released to The Associated Press by the school show the percentage of women who passed the entrance exam rose from 24 percent in 2009 to 38 percent in 2010. The figure has since stayed below that level until decreasing to 18 percent this year, when a total of 171 students passed the exam. The ratio of female applicants who were accepted this year was 2.9 percent, compared to 8.8 percent for men.

 

Ban imposed on import of Rabies vaccine from tainted Chinese company


The drug controller general of India on Tuesday banned the import of the rabies vaccine from Chinese vaccine manufacturer Changchun Changsheng Life Sciences, which was found to have faked records and ordered to stop production earlier this month by China’s drug controller.

Rabies kills an estimated 20,000 people in India each year, according to the National Rabies Control Programme.
The drug controller general of India on Tuesday banned the import of the rabies vaccine from Chinese vaccine manufacturer Changchun Changsheng Life Sciences, which was found to have faked records and ordered to stop production earlier this month by China’s drug controller.
Officials familiar with the matter said the vaccine is imported by India and procured by both private and government centres that administer it for protection from rabies, which is 100% fatal but can be prevented by vaccination. Rabies kills an estimated 20,000 people in the country each year, according to the National Rabies Control Programme.
“We’re in the process of issuing a show cause notice to the procurer who gets the vaccine for the government .

“The vaccine is being used in India, but we don’t have the exact details of the total number of units imported or where they have been distributed. I have asked my staff to prepare a detailed information report on its import and distribution,” Reddy added. “Once we get the information, we will ask for a recall of the vaccine from market. But till then, there is a blanket ban on its import.”
Rabies is endemic throughout the country, with the exception of Andaman & Nicobar and Lakshadweep. Dogs are responsible for about 97% of human rabies, followed by cats (2%) and monkeys, mongoose and others (1%). According to the city’s civic agencies, each week about 8,000 shots are given to prevent rabies in all government hospitals.
“We get 500 to 700 cases each day, which also includes people there for booster doses. Dog and rat bites are very common. A combination of anti-rabies vaccine, serum and tetanus is injected, depending on the severity of the bite,” said a staff member at Safdarjung Hospital who asked not to be named.
“We usually get products from procurers, who get it from importers. Both Indian- and foreign-made drugs and vaccines, including those from China, are used in the public sector.
On July 24, Chinese president Xi Jinping has ordered a “thorough investigation” into widespread concerns that hundreds of thousands of infants might have been administered fake vaccines produced by one of the country’s largest pharmaceutical firms.
According to official news agency Xinhua, Xi had termed “the illegal production of vaccines by Changchun Changsheng Life Sciences Limited as hideous and appalling”. Reports suggested the company may have supplied ineffective DPT (diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus) vaccines that were given to babies as young as three months old, and forging data for anti-rabies vaccines.
As outrage among people in China grew over the past week, the company’s leaders apologised in a statement on Sunday, saying they felt “deeply ashamed”, according to the New York Times.

India expenditure on health 1 %, of GDP, Lower than Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka


  •  India’s per capita public expenditure on health increased from Rs 621 in 2009-10 to Rs 1,112 (around $16 at current exchange rate) in 2015-16
  • According to National Health Profile (2018), around 43 crore individuals or 34% of the population were covered under any health insurance in 2016-17

It is not difficult to diagnose the ailments of health system. System that requires more input, is suffering  due to  decades of neglect.  It  reflects  a lower priority to health sector.

India’s public health expenditure — 1% of its gross domestic product (GDP) — may have witnessed a marginal improvement from 0.98% in 2014, but it is still way behind even the low-income countries that spend 1.4% on an average, shows National Health Profile 2018.

India is spending even less than some of its neighbors countries such as Bhutan (2.5%), Sri Lanka (1.6%) and Nepal (1.1%), according to the annual report released on Tuesday by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, the health intelligence wing of the directorate general of health services in the Union ministry of health and family welfare.

In World Health Organization’s South-East Asian Region, which includes 10 countries, India finishes second last, above only Bangladesh (0.4%), when their health expenditure is compared. Maldives spends 9.4% of its GDP to claim the top spot in the list, followed by Thailand (2.9%).

India’s National Health Policy 2017 proposes raising the public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP by 2025.

India currently spends a little over 1% of GDP on health, far below Singapore which has the lowest public spend on health at 2.2% of GDP among countries with significant universal health coverage (UHC) service, according latest National Health Profile (NHP) data.

India’s per capita public expenditure on health increased from Rs 621 in 2009-10 to Rs 1,112 (around $16 at current exchange rate) in 2015-16. However, it is still “nominal”, compared to other countries. Switzerland spends $6944 on health per capita, whereas the US spends $4802 and UK spends$3500.

Government  plans to launch its ambitious National Health Protection Scheme (NHPS)- Ayushman Bharat – to cover over 10 crore poor families with an annual health cover of Rs 5 lakh per family. A successful implementation may bring some positive change to the ailing system.

Real challenge is to provide basic health facilities to remote areas.  Even good preventive care and primary care to under privileged can also  bring a significant change.

 

Pharma- Malaise may get treatment: unique IDs of drugs soon to check fakes


Usually every problem related to health is called medical malaise, but that is a misnomer.  In fact health care comprises tens of different industries. Collective malaise of all these is conveniently projected as medical malaise, related to doctors. Rest remain invisible, earn money and  doctors are blamed. As doctor is a common universal link that is visible with patient. By an average application of wisdom, it is easy to blame doctors for everything,    that goes wrong with patient.

One such problem is presence of fake medicines.  If patient gets fake or low quality medicines and does not get well or gets side effects, doctor will face harassment. Whereas people involved and industry will be sitting pretty and  make money.

Therefore any such step  to correct Pharma –malaise should be a welcome step for  doctors. Although it will be a complex issue, because of complexity involved in implementation and execution of policies. But recognition and beginning to think of the problem is also an important step.

May be a time to treat Pharma- malaise.

India’s highest advisory body on drugs will discuss a mechanism to end the menace of counterfeit medicines at a meeting on 16 May.

According to the proposal to be discussed at the Drug Technical Advisory Board meeting, consumers will be able to check whether the medicines that they have purchased are genuine by texting a unique code to be printed on the medicine’s package to a number, said two people aware of the matter, both of whom requested anonymity.

The government plans to initially build a data bank of 300 medicine brands and their consumption pattern in various parts of the country.

Drug companies will then be asked to print a unique 14-digit alphanumeric code on the package of the drug. Consumers buying the medicine can then inquire via a text message whether the code—and therefore the medicine—is genuine or not.

Pharma firms may be asked to print a unique 14-digit code on drugs’ packaging; consumers can send a text message to find out if the code is genuine or not

A government survey conducted between 2014 and 2016 had found 3.16% of drug samples it tested to be sub-standard, while 0.02% were spurious

A WHO report in 2017 revealed approximately 10.5% of medicines in low- and middle-income countries including India are sub-standard or fake

 

The unique identification code will help consumers avoid buying fake products. The idea is that within seconds, the person should receive a reply indicating whether the drug is legitimate.

 

Fake medicines lead to drug resistance in humans and cause a significant number of deaths, according to public health experts. A government survey

conducted between 2014 and 2016 to check the proportion of substandard drugs in India had found 3.16% of the samples it tested to be substandard, while 0.02% were spurious.

Significantly, even samples from big drug makers were found to be not of standard quality during the survey carried out through the National Institute of Biologicals, according to regulator Central Drugs Standard Control Organization.

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals under regulatory scrutiny for alleged misconduct


Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd is under regulatory scrutiny for alleged misconduct in carrying out clinical trials recently in Jaipur.

The Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) has allegedly found that fake identities were used in clinical trials, as well as evidence of substantial departures from good clinical practice (GCP), in what could be the latest blow for India’s drug-testing industry, which has run into a series of problems with international regulators in recent years.

The alleged misconduct on the part of the company has triggered a tough response from India’s apex drug regulatory authority, which has sent a show cause notice to the company for failing to ensure that clinical trial was conducted in accordance with the Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules 1945, GCP guidelines. The regulatory body has sought an explanation about the alleged irregularities within 10 days. Glenmark has, however, denied any wrongdoing.

The company came under the scanner following reports that several people were deceived into participating in an ongoing trial for pain medication to treat osteoarthritis at a  Multispeciality Hospital in Jaipur. A total of 38 kits were supplied by the company, of which only three were issued to the enrolled patients on April 6. Glenmark has suspended the trials.

CDSCO, which had initiated the inquiry and sent a team from its head office on 22 April to the site, found inadequate and inconsistent patient identification. According to the investigations, the enrolment of subjects was “falsified” and “cannot be relied upon”.

The team also found that out of three patients mentioned in the informed consent form (ICF), two were related to each other and did not visit the hospital in the last six months.

 

Reversal of medical advancement, reversion of the enemy : ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE


Substances with antibiotic properties had been used for various purposes since ancient times.

Before the early 20th century, treatments for infections were based primarily on medicinal folklore. Mixtures with antimicrobial properties that were used in treatments of infections were described over 2000 years ago. Many ancient cultures, including the ancient Egyptians and ancient Greeks, used specially selected mold and plant materials and extracts to treat infections.

For their successful development of penicillin, which Fleming had accidentally discovered but could not develop himself, as a therapeutic drug, Chain and Florey shared the 1945 Nobel Prize in Medicine with Fleming.

Germ theory and discovery of antibiotics has contributed a lot to development of modern medicine. Treatment of advanced multi system diseases, complex surgeries, advanced procedures have become easier to handle because of  advent of antibiotics.  

Over the last several decades, antibacterial drug use has become widespread with their misuse being an ever‑ increasing phenomenon. Consequently, antibacterial drugs have become less effective or even ineffective, resulting in a global health security emergency. These infections will be associated with a high consumption of healthcare resources manifested by a prolonged hospital stay and high mortality. The World Health Organization  has identified antimicrobial resistance as one of the most important problems for human health with significant adverse impacts on clinical outcomes and higher costs due to consumption of healthcare resources.

Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem in all parts of the world including Asia–Pacific, Latin America, Middle East, Europe and North America regions. A particular concern is the misuse or overuse of antibiotics, which has led to the development of resistant or super-resistant bacterial strains.

Reasons for widespread antibiotic resistance:

  1. High burden of infectious diseases
  2. Poor control of infectious diseases and lack of prevention.
  3. Easy availability of antibioics.
  4. Liberal prescription and crosspathy. Common and unrestricted use  by alternative medical system doctors, non doctors and quacks.
  5. Over the counter sale of antibiotics by pharmacists.
  6. Self administration of antibiotics by patients.
  7. Shorter courses and irregular intake of antibiotics by patients.
  8. Inappropriate doses of antibiotics, specially if given by non trained person.
  9. Pressure by patients for early recovery, resulting in over prescription.
  10. Presence of large number of generics of molecules and their quality not ensured.
  11. Poor environmental sanitation, widespread  water contamination, animal waste.
  12. Lack of proper regulation and control of quality of antibiotics
  13. Unregulated  use of antibiotics in animal industry, agriculture, and aquaculture.

 

It is not uncommon to see patients not responding well to treatment. Such scenario increase difficulty for doctors, besides they may be blamed for not doing enough. Reasons may be any of the  above.  Bacteria have been the occupants around us in environment  and also in our body, have acquired deadly weapons  quickly.  Discovery of antibiotics have not lasted even 100 years. Over enthusiasm and euphoria  created by  mass production and use of antibiotics may prove lethal for human race. Antibiotic resistance has potential to undo all the advancement and is a threat of return to pre- antibiotic era .

 

 

25 factors -Medical treatment costs becoming expensive: are doctors responsible?


Although doctors are blamed for expensive medical treatment, but the real cause  is the aberrant evolution of medicine and medical education to almost an industrial model. There has been tremendous rise in health care  expenses in last few decades and it is usually borne by the government, taxpayer, insurance or patient himself. Discontent is all the more if patients  are unable to bear these expenses and if the results are not as per  expectations ( realistic or unrealistic).

Following features have led to increasing dependence on investors in medical field which then has to run along the lines of an industry to ensure its financial viability-

1.Newer technology and  rapid advances in newer innovations in medical fields  for improvement in diagnostic and newer treatment modalities. If a hospital or doctor does not upgrade, it will be regarded as  having obsolete technology.  Most of these medical technologies  are extremely expensive and owned and marketed  by big multinational companies who  sell them.

Since cost involved is very high, there can be various types of deals involved between  middlemen  involved in selling and buying these equipments and technologies. Doctors  are the  end users of these technologies, but  not part of business process. They are actually the consumers and users  for  these technologies.

2.Expensive real estate:  A self made doctor at the start  or even during his life time, does not have the kind of finances  to build  a hospital which needs a large parcel of land with commercial location. Therefore there  is a need for big investment or investor to pitch in and invest funds.  And if they invest, obviously they would look for some returns.

3.Equipping the Hospital: Building of hospital with the  infrastructure  and equipping it well needs lot of money and investment which only an investor can provide. Same is true for maintenance of equipment, bills,  insurances, AMC  etc.

4.Staffing of Hospital: A hospital needs lot of skilled human resources, health care being a highly labour intensive industry.  Doctors , nurses,  technicians, para medical, administrative and clerical staff is required.  Employment of non medical  in hospital industry too has been increasing because of various regulatory requirements and complex processes other than just treating patients.

5.High regulatory requirements:  globally the requirements of regulatory authorities have been sky rocketing and it requires  a lot of manpower to maintain such data. Getting accreditation etc are  processes which requires manpower, time, and a legal team. All these legal  requirements are expensive.

6.Consumer protection act:  This single important factor can increase the cost of  healthcare for the patient. As doctors are increasingly scared of being dragged to court, they are always on backfoot and are forced  to do defensive practice. Investigations are required for documentation. Patient and courts will ask for proof and goes by documentation.  Medical problems are very complex and  sometimes it is difficult to judge  the future course of disease or decisions for surgery, or how patient will behave before or after surgery. A doctor, thus, will always try to play safe legally  in present scenarios. Because everything he does will be scrutinized later, with retrospective wisdom,  by courts. And   since doctors manage  so many patients everyday, they never know which one will harass and deceive them  later.  Mistrust has increased to such an  extent that patient relatives do not understand even if things are told in good faith and in patient’s interest.  Summarily doctors have to safeguard themselves from treatment as well as legal and  documentation hassles.

7.Expensive legal services:  Every case that goes to court involves lawyers and their expensive fees. Most of the time even though the doctors may be right, he has to defend himself with the help of  lawyers.  Law industry has been  benefitted enormously because of consumer protection act at the cost of doctors. Increasing mistrust and unhappiness in patient’s mind definitely does not  help patients and doctors. Strangely  doctor’s fee are quite low but lawyers charges them astronomical amounts, which are beyond any logic.

8.Increased expectation of patients : People want exceptional care, best in the world with best technology,  that also at a price less than  even a meal in restaurant, and then they want a quick relief!!  This is an expectation almost impossible to fulfil. Even government hospitals, which are funded by taxayer’s money find it difficult to provide free treatment with quality.

9.Large claims given by courts:  in a country where people  fight with their parents, brothers and  sisters for money and property, it will be naive to think that idea of making money from doctor  does not exist. With court compensations going into crores, doctors  can sense many times that some patient relatives  try to use the opportunity. They have nothing at stake so they try to make some noise on social media and harass the doctor in court or on social platforms. Even for patients, who had poor prognosis at the very onset of treatment, relatives can create problems. Doctors have no protection from these nuisanse. All these factors further enhance insecurity in doctor’s mind.

  1. Expensive and time consuming Medical education, on sale: Although an open secret , as reported routinely in news, medical seats are big business. Each private medical college seat sells for huge money. Such doctors, who have purchased seats have already  behaved as investors. Once these  doctors are in practice, they will try to  recover the investment. This can obviously push up the health care costs not to mention vitiation of the medical fraternity.

11.Requirement for maintaining huge data and audits:  to maintain standards, to have accreditions, for medicolegal issues , large data storage, audits and surveillance is required. These systems also need  new systems and manpower.

12.Employment of large numbers of  non-medical personnel:  earlier management work was handled by doctors. All senior doctors were given small and differnet  departments of  administrative work at very little  or no extra cost. But now for all these works separate administrators  are appointed. Now a days ratio of doctors to nondoctors is higher as compared to previous years. Increased regulatory and  and insurance system needs more non- medical staff.

But  productivity of hospital still remains by  doctor-patient interaction.  This change in arrangement in Hospitals has caused  increase in costs and hence pushed the health care  expenses. Advantages and disadvangages of these changes  in arrangement will be known  with time in future.

13.Non regulation of  businesses  associated with large health care industry: for example pharma industry,  suppliers , biomedical, equipments, consumables. Such individuals,  although play important part in medicine, cost, sale and purchase, but are largely  unregulated. Unlike doctors, who are regulated by multiple governing bodies. But doctors are  often perceived  as culprits for these costs escalation.

14.Increasing extinction of Single doctor and  small setups: for them it will be difficult to keep pace with newer technology and buying expansive equipments. It will be difficult  for them to manage requirements of new medical system, legal problems . At the most they will continue to provide cheap medical services,  but for only common and simple ailments. It will be difficult to manage serious patients and sick and complex patients in view of high public expectations . These set ups are under severe security threat and pressure because of non – acceptance of even genuinine complications of treatment.  As legal requirements increase,  these systems will become unviable and option of common public for cheaper, friendly services may become extinct. So it will decrease  the  easy and  sometimes last option of  doctors to settle with a small set up. Chances of them to work for investors  and insurance companies will increase, and they will be cheap labour for industry.

15.Medical and health Insurance becoming indispensible:  Insurance companies are every where.  They sell policies to patients , as well as doctors.  In fact, they are  positioned between doctor and patients. They make money from both sides. Obviously more expensive the treatment, more dependence on insurance. Therefore a cycle has been set up.  Increase in  insurance cost  will push health care  more expensive and a vicious cycle is set up. One should not be surprised, if in future treatment to a large extent will be dictated by insurance companies.

16.Conversion to a industry:

Because of above reasons Medical and health care has become an industry and needs investors. So as it is business proposition. Funded by investors and run on commercial principles, the  doctors are being slowly reduced to  skilled labour, alienated from the core.

  1. Aging, multiple diseases : as life expectancy is increasing, it is leading to multiple diseases and more complex diseases  and new expensive treatments.  In this changed scenario and  all people  want to prolong life as much as possible. Cost of prolonging life with multiple problems is quite high. It consumes more medication and resouces and hence consequently pushes up the cost of medical treatment.

18.Evolution of complex infections:

    Advent of antibiotics   and germ theory was thought to be game changer in medical history. But because bacteria proved to be smarter than humans and acquired resistant. New and expensive antibiotics have been gradually being rendered useless. Need for more antibiotics is causing treatment to be costlier.

19.Evolution  of  advanced treatment:  Invention  of Expensive and new diagnostic techniques along with highly technical treatments by industry is not without added cost.  Although it may be useful in certain patients, but how much it will help overall in masses, for general treatment, as it increases the  cost of overall treatment.

20.Increasing  need for heightened security:  It is not uncommon to have mobs causing physical harms to medical workers  and  damaging hospital properties. These incidents have caused increased need for security for the premises and adding to the cost.

 21.Complex interplay of various industries eg pharma industry and consumable industry:  large  number of consumables pharmaceuticals, sutures,  surgical instruments, IT industry, drugs, implants, medical supplies are required.  These industries supply their items on a price commanded by them and there is complex interplay  of various industries.

  1. Non uniform and variable care and cost:  each city has multiple hospitals. Care and cost varies in  every set up. Even all government set ups are  not uniform in facilities and cost. Private setups  vary in cost and care, to the extent of  maximum possible variations. All this non-uniformity has created confusion in the mind of patients and variation in financial issues.
  2. Poor public health care facilities: due to less expenditure on health care, government health care facilities have been under developed.  Less  investment by government has given way to private health care to flourish.

24: Conversion to a industry model  and entry of Investor: all the above investments are very expensive. Doctors usually do not have that much money to invest. Therefore   Investors and financers  have become indispensible part of health.   once investor invests money, it will be driven on business principles.

  1. Future course: I do not see in future that this arrangement is going to change , rather it will be strengthened more and more and quality care will become more costly. Doctors will  be totally  alienated  from financial  and business aspect, because industry will  not be sustainable without an investor.

 

As we look at reasons above, Doctors are no where in the financial picture and  to be blamed for increase in overall health cost.  But since only doctors are visible part of industry, who treat and interact with patients, often they are blamed for  the cost. They have actually being alienated from financial aspect, barring small percentage of doctors, who are financially literate. Consequently, the doctors who will be unable to entrench themselves in the business milieu will be unfit  in future and hence extinct.

Doctor’s predicament: How to treat prejudiced minds of patients?


“Medical negligence” is the word in the air. Routine complications of treatment, poor prognosis of severe diseases and death of sick patients are blown out of proportion and projected as negligence of doctors. All these insinuations are creating fear in the minds of gullible masses, who do not have any idea about the complexity of medical profession and treatment of diseases.

Thing have become so difficult that it will become difficult to treat even simple diseases in future. Non acceptance of natural progression of disease or genuine complications of surgeries by a patients has created fear among doctors. This is due to vicious campaign by media and has done irreversible damage to doctor patient relationship.

Instead of trying to improve the health care system as a whole, focus has settled on blaming the doctor only. Less number of doctors, poor health care system and insufficient resources are nowhere in focus.

Being a doctor is a tough journey. Nature of work that provides relief to human beings, while sacrificing his own personal life should be respected by civilized society. But sadly, doctors are projected in a bad light due to vicious campaign by media and celebrities. The due respect and appreciation is sadly lacking. This kind of malicious allegation against a profession community has created a sense of mistrust against the doctors in the mind of patients. Situation has become so bad that a patient, while interacting with his doctor, is not trusting the correct advice and decisions taken by a doctor in good faith. Patient will question the advice and most of the time delay his own treatment. Not uncommonly the treatment is delayed and crucial time is wasted for unnecessary reasons.

Hostile environment, risk to doctor himself, unrealistic expectations of society, retrospective analysis, physical and verbal assaults, medical industry and medico–legal issues have created a complex environment for doctors.

Although doctors have learnt to live with this pain of mistrust thrust upon them and they are suffering. But it does not require an Einstein brain to anticipate that who will be suffering ultimately due to this kind of mistrust. Society seems to be going to self destructive mode. At present, doctors and patients both are sufferers. May be media and celebrities will earn some money and fame by creating and propagating this mistrust.

Aberrant Evolution of medical profession: will it help the patient?


With advances in medical science, simultaneously there has been aberrant evolution of medical profession, education, regulation and medical industry. By provoking controversy about doctors for varied reasons, medical industry and law has been positioned between the doctor and  patient and  taken a center stage in health care. Till now, doctor patient interaction was the central point of the health industry, a core around which medical industry revolved. But now   this interaction, treatment and  almost everything is controlled by industry and regulated in some manner. There have been technical advancements to promote better treatment and diagnosis but these, at the same time, increase the cost of treatment, involvement of industry and hence dependence on investors.

 There has been advancements, but are they in right direction?

Discouragement  of medical fraternity:  The adage “To err is human” probably does not apply to the doctors anymore. Doctors are definitely regarded different from rest of the humans and are not supposed to have privileges that other persons of humankind are guaranteed. Hence they are harassed often for any adverse clinical outcome even though it may be because of poor prognosis of patient. They work under continuous fear and stress and are punished for each small or big error.

Commercial evolution of medical education: medical student are now forced to pay exorbitant fee with lower standards of education.  

Evolution in medico legal  procedures:  extensive and complex communication, technical advancements and legal interactions has taken a toll on the doctors. But more importantly, how that has improved the patient care or  doctor patient relationship? I feel, it has created fear in mind of doctors and deterioration of doctor patient relationship.

 Evlution of Doctor patient relationship and Trust :In all the complexity, trust between doctor patient has taken a hit. A good paternistic relationship, now has been converted to more of a legal one. Trust has been replaced by  mutual fear.

Evolution of Complex medical regulation and documentation: There has been overzealous regulation of medical profession. Time and resouces which should have been utilized for treatment of patients,  has to be used for complex documentation.

Evolution of media and social media: Painful retrospective analysis of work of doctor by media, courts and public contuse. Decisions which doctors has to take in moments are analysed retrospectively by everyone with wisdom of hindsight over years, without understanding complexities involved.

Evolution of Insurance sector: increasing cost of treatment and  medicolegal component has made both patients and doctors paying to insurance companies.

            This kind of aberrant evolution of medical profession has increased the problems of doctors and patients and it is not helping anyone. Ultimately it will help everyone except doctor and patient. Ultimately discourage the excellence in medical care.

 

Medical Regulation:Is it time to regulate medical business/ administrators of healthcare? “Oxygen cut, 30 children die in Gorakhpur hospital” who is responsible?


The inconsolable   catastrophic calamity in Gorakhpur Hospital is a mishap, which should be  preventable by good medical governance.   This is a real life example of negligence by poorly managed system, which has resulted in loss of multiple lives. Poor competence of administrators is more damaging, less containable, more damaging institutionally than smaller unintentional human errors by doctors. More than sadness, it is a painful surprise that such things can happen in present era of mammoth advancements! Until now, discussion on every such incidence stopped with blame on doctors in the end. No body will even try to look beyond doctor’s faults as it is easier to find some mistake or the other by retrospective analysis in doctor’s work or documents. That helps in cover up of system faults. Since ultimately it is only the doctor who is visible with the patient, doctor has to bear onus of each medical or non medical problems of health system. In routine circumstances, after the unanticipated death, one or two doctors  are made scapegoat, thrashed or harassed, unless proved innocent few years on, that also if they are lucky enough to have impartial investigation. Doctors carry the burden of universal expectations, thanklessness, threats and vandalism for bad outcomes, even in absence of proper health facilities. That is how, rest of medical industry, administrator  and non doctors associated with the health care,  mainly responsible for the problems,  enjoy   strange kind of immunity. But since now problems are overflowing  and big enough to unmask the real hidden people responsible for poor health care system in case an impartial inquiry is done.  Is it time to regulate all people including non doctors and medical businesses who are associated with health sector, in the manner doctors are regulated?

Oxygen cut, 30 children die in Gorakhpur hospital. Criminal negligence, row over unpaid bills hit encephalitis, neonatal wards.( Hindustan times)

 

Foremost admission is that we do not have a proper foolproof health care system. Strangely, the perpetual inadequacy of state healthcare infrastructure is never questioned.  Problems of electricity, oxygen, quality of drugs, medicine, quality of consumables, heath insurance implants and stents have very important role to play in treatment of the patient and cost associated with it. Doctors need essential items and can not work without  drugs and equipment , which are supplied by industry and procured by administrators.  Marketing, sales, pricing, insurance, quality  and all business deals  of these items are  beyond doctors preview. Therefore the  actual number of  non doctors  involved in health sector are beyond any imagination and these people  are not regulated in any manner. Ultimate blame is wrapped up by incriminating whole community of doctors, resulting  in misguided  conclusions. All these complex issues ends up with society inflicting a mode of self harm by mistrusting their savior.  In fact, there has been an article feeling a need for regulation of NHS managers, in a way same as doctors.

NHS Managers should face same regulation as doctors, says Francis

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2055 ( 25 April 2017)

Possibly it is time to unmask   and unveil the whole mammoth industry and regulate each and every person associated with health, in a manner same as doctors.  Role of non doctors , touts, different streams of medicine, administrators,  sales and marketing , medical  finance,  electricity, oxygen, cost and  quality medicine, drugs, consumables, implants and stents has very important   role to play and doctors should not be   burdened  with criticism for  all the mess created by all other people. Good health care system should be designed to prevent tragedies. Strict action after the event is just finding scapegoats.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑